What set Sparta
apart from other Greek city-states was not language, religion, or even laws –
all of which were shared in broad terms with the rest of the ancient Hellenic
world – but a unique ethos that permeated all aspects of life. While Spartan philosophy valued silence over
empty words, simplicity over decoration and precision over expansiveness,
Sparta placed the liberty, equality and fraternity at the center of their
ethical system. Love of liberty was
shared by all the ancient Greek democracies, but the emphasis on equality and
fraternity set Sparta apart.
There is no clear
explanation for the roots of Sparta's unique emphasis on silence, simplicity,
and precision, although it probably had Doric roots. Doric architecture, for
example, is the simplest of the three Greek architectural orders. Nevertheless, there is
little doubt that by the 5th century BC, Sparta had cultivated a tradition that
put conscious emphasis on silence and simplicity over eloquence and decoration.
What is often overlooked by modern commentators is that the silence cultivated
in Sparta was not the silence of dumb animals, but of thinking men, who
recognize that it is wise to think before speaking and to speak only when they
have something worth saying. This is the essence of Spartan rhetoric and the
reason it was so highly prized by philosophers such as Socrates and Plato. If
one is looking for a more modern parallel, the example of the Quakers might be
appropriate.
Simplicity in dress, architecture, and art was a natural expression of this fundamental philosophy that "less is more" and precision preferable to ambiguity and ambivalence. To say that Spartan dress and architecture were simpler than that of contemporary cities is not to say it was primitive, only that it was more precise and made more use of natural elements. The focus on the functional and the essential need not be associated with a disdain for beauty. Most modern observers admire the Parthenon in Athens today for the perfection of its proportions and would be irritated and distracted to see it painted brightly, as it was in ancient times. Likewise, modern architecture and design has rediscovered the Spartan love of the pure beauty of form and material.
Simplicity in dress, architecture, and art was a natural expression of this fundamental philosophy that "less is more" and precision preferable to ambiguity and ambivalence. To say that Spartan dress and architecture were simpler than that of contemporary cities is not to say it was primitive, only that it was more precise and made more use of natural elements. The focus on the functional and the essential need not be associated with a disdain for beauty. Most modern observers admire the Parthenon in Athens today for the perfection of its proportions and would be irritated and distracted to see it painted brightly, as it was in ancient times. Likewise, modern architecture and design has rediscovered the Spartan love of the pure beauty of form and material.
The Spartan land reform (described in the essay on the Spartan government and
constitution) made all Spartan citizens equals, or Peers; and they not only
described themselves as such, but reinforced the notion of equality by
discouraging anything that would set one citizen apart or above another. Sparta
was the first city-state to introduce a uniform for its army: scarlet chitons
and cloaks, and indeed uniform shields, all bearing the lambda, or L, for
Lacedaemon. Spartans also wore their hair in the same fashion: the boys of the
agoge going about shaved, the young men with short hair, and the men over the
age of thirty growing out their hair and often wearing it braided. Not until
the second half of the 5th century do artistic depictions of Spartans indicate
that the neat appearance of the archaic period had given way to an unkempt,
almost barbaric fashion.
All adult male citizens were, furthermore, bound together through three
distinct and separate institutions. First, the sons of citizens were required
to attend the public school system, the agoge, from the age of seven
through the age of twenty. Second, all male citizens between and including the
ages of 21 and 60 had to serve in the army. A distinction was made between the
first 10 age cohorts, who were required to live in barracks and were in effect
on active service, and the elder age cohorts, who lived at home but could be
called up at any time, similar to reserve status today. Third, all male
citizens were required to join a syssitia, or dining club, and to eat at this
club every night (unless excused), providing set amounts of food from their
estates to support the common meals. Although every citizen had to belong to a
syssitia (also known as phiditia), each citizen chose which club he wanted to
join and the existing members voted to admit the new applicant – or not. One veto
from an existing member was sufficient to prevent a new member from joining.
Unexcused absence from the mess incurred a fine – something not even the kings
were exempt from. However, Spartiates (Spartan citizens) could be excused for a
variety of reasons, from war to hunting and the Olympic Games.
The bonds of school, military, and club were designed to keep the society closely knit and not divided along family and clan lines. They did not, however, replace family ties, as some modern observers assume.
The bonds of school, military, and club were designed to keep the society closely knit and not divided along family and clan lines. They did not, however, replace family ties, as some modern observers assume.
Attending the agoge, the public school, from the age of 7 did not sever family
ties any more than sending children to school today does. There is no evidence
that the small children slept in barracks – they may well have slept at home –
but even if they slept in dormitories on school nights, they would still have
gone home for holidays. Sparta had many holidays, and some were so important
that observance of them was more important than going to war – even in an
emergency. School children would have spent probably as much as one-third of
any year away from school, much as they do today. Furthermore, Spartan girls
went to the same schools and gymnasiums as their brothers – and future
husbands. Spartan youth therefore had far more contact with the opposite sex
than did their contemporaries in other Greek cities, which in turn meant that
the bonds between the sexes were also stronger than elsewhere. Shared memories
of a common schooling would have strengthened Spartan marriages, and parents
would have been careful to pass on their experiences of the agoge to their
offspring in order to help them survive this critical prerequisite of
citizenship.
The military duties of Spartan men were likewise less onerous than modern
military service in distant theaters of war, which can keep men away from their
families for years on end. Until the Peloponnesian War, ancient warfare
consisted of marching out, meeting the enemy on a flat, open plain, fighting a
single battle, and then returning home – victorious or defeated – within a few
weeks. Most campaigns lasted no more than a month or two, and they usually took
place after the harvest was in. Sparta was not continuously at war until the
second half of the 5th century. Before that, Spartan men would not have been
away at war for more than a few months at a time, and by no means every year.
Some men might have been absent at war no more than a month or two in their
entire lives.
Finally, the fact that men ate their evening meal away from their families need
not have been more disruptive of good marital or family life than the fact that
most modern couples eat their midday meal apart. On the contrary, the rhythm of
Spartan life might actually have fostered good family relations, because men
and women probably would have shared the middle of the day together, when other
activities were not possible because of the heat.